Publication Ethics & Bad Actors
![Screenshot of the title and abstract section of the article "What's the Deal with Birds" by Daniel T. Baldassarre. The abstract reads: "Many people wonder: what’s the deal with birds? This is a common query. Birds are pretty weird. I mean, they have feathers. WTF? Most other animals don’t have feathers. To investigate this issue, I looked at some birds. I looked at a woodpecker, a parrot, and a penguin. They were all pretty weird! In conclusion, we may never know the deal with birds, but further study is warranted."](https://scholarlyinfo.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/27328/files/2023/06/Whats-the-Deal-with-Birds--1024x699.png)
The article “What’s the Deal with Birds?” was accepted for publication in the “journal” Scientific Journal of
Research and Reviews. See the full article.
Topics will include:
- So-called “predatory” journals
- Evaluating journals
- Varieties of researcher malfeasance
- Retractions, corrections, and withdrawals
Assignments for July 5:
- Follow Question 8.2 in forum to prepare for class discussion.
Readings for July 5:
Hoffman, S. G., Joyce, K., Alegria, S., Bell, S. E., Cruz, T. M., Noble, S. U., Shestakofsky, B., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2022). Five big ideas about AI. Contexts, 21(3), 8–15. Available via GC library.
United States Copyright Office. (2023, March 16). Copyright registration guidance: Works containing material generated by artificial intelligence.
Day, T. (2023). A preliminary investigation of fake peer-reviewed citations and references generated by ChatGPT. The Professional Geographer.
Waard, A. de. (2023, January 18). Guest post – AI and scholarly publishing: A view from three experts. The Scholarly Kitchen.
Brainard, J. (2023, February 22). As scientists explore AI-written text, journals hammer out policies. Science.